The Weiner Component V.2 #33 – The Concept of Money: Part 1

Various Federal Reserve Notes, c.1995. Only th...

Various Federal Reserve Notes, c.1995. Only the designs of the $1 and $2 (the latter not pictured) are still in print. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: USA annual GDP from 1910-60, in billi...

English: USA annual GDP from 1910-60, in billions of constant 2005 dollars, with the years of the Great Depression (1929-1939) highlighted. Based on data from: Louis D. Johnston and Samuel H. Williamson, “What Was the U.S. GDP Then?” MeasuringWorth, 2008. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Perhaps one of the most misunderstood terms in the world today is money.  Practically all people understand it to be what it was one hundred years ago.  Money can be used as a commodity; whereby it can earn more money.  But it has always had that ability.  Mainly, however, it is a means of exchange.  It allows goods and/or services to be transferred into other goods and/or services.  By itself today it has no intrinsic value.

 

Most people think of it as having an intrinsic value that it had up to the end of the first third of the 20th Century when it mainly consisted of precious metal.  The problem with money being a precious metal like gold or silver is that it makes two unrelated entities dependent upon each other.  These two entities are never in balance.

 

For the economic system of a nation or nations to work properly there must always be enough precious metal available to equal the required amount of exchange of goods and services.  This condition has almost never existed.  With the exception of the 16th Century, when there was too much gold available in Europe because of the looting of the New World, there has never been enough precious metals available to match the needs of the business world.  Today all money in every country consists of valueless tokens generally printed by the Government controlling each particular nation.  This allows for a reasonable exchange of goods and services.

 

The wealth of a nation is not its money supply; it is the human productivity of a fiscal year, twelve months.  Since it is a measurement the value of the goods and services are expressed in terms of dollars or whatever the monetary measurement is of the particular country.  It is the Gross Domestic Product, the GDP.

 

Today money is a tool, having no value in itself, that allows for the exchange of goods and services within each nation.  Its effectiveness is determined by the sophistication of the nation utilizing it.  The amount needed within the society is ever changing.  The ability of each particular nation to determine these changes and continually bring them about determines the level of sophistication.  It is not an easy process.

************************************

Little is actually known about the specific origins of money but the probability is that it was first used by the Phoenicians in the pre-Christian era (1500 to 300 BC).  They were one of the first known merchant groups, trading along the shores of the Mediterranean Sea.  Initially goods were traded for other goods (barter) or for valuable metals, gold and silver.  Presumably scales were used to measure the gold or silver that was traded.  At some point, during this period, someone came up with the idea of taking a small weight of the metal and stamping its weight upon it.  Eventually this would be replaced by some sort of image, probably a side view of the ruler.  These would be the first minted coins.  Less expensive metals could be used for smaller amounts.  The development of this process could have taken hundreds of years.  The value of money would be universal and largely equal, making the coins equally usable in virtually any nation.

 

This type of trade would continue into the early 20th Century.  With time and the development of technology, coins would become sophisticated but the methods of international trade would remain essentially the same.  During the 14th and 15th Centuries Letters of Credit would become available with financial institutions having offices or banks in a multitude of countries making international trade easier.  The use of checks would develop later.

 

When the Great Depression began in 1929, the Republican, Herbert Hoover was President of the United States.  Hoover believed in the Free Market making all economic decisions and kept waiting for prosperity to return.  The depression continued, growing deeper.  In 1933, the Democrat, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected President.  He had promised the nation a New Deal.  His program was Relief, Recovery, and Reform.  Suddenly in various ways the Federal Government began providing for people who couldn’t provide for themselves.

 

The program had to be paid for.  The GDP had decreased as unemployment increased.  The government couldn’t raise taxes.  What the Roosevelt Administration did was to collect all the money in the country; that is, collect all the gold coins.  Many people objected, the government sued them and won every case.  The coins were melted down into gold blocks and paper gold certificates were issued and kept by the Federal Government.  Presumably, based upon the gold certificates paper money, Federal Reserve Notes, were issued in place of the gold coins.  In addition the government legally changed the value of the gold from sixteen dollars an ounce to thirty-two dollars an ounce.  The Federal Government doubled the money supply and kept half of the newly created money to pay for its programs.

 

One dollar and five dollar bills were silver certificates, ten dollar bills up were Federal Reserve Notes.  The question arises: Did the Federal Government carefully monitor the amount of paper money it issued to perfectly match the gold certificates it held.  The answer, I suspect, would be, No.  I remember, as a child, in the late 1930s hearing how good the money was because of the gold certificates.  But I never heard of anyone questioning the issue.  It was just assumed.  In point of fact, the probability is that money was issued as needed.  The gold certificates, while they did exist as the basis of money were essentially a fiction.

 

World War II ended the Great Depression.  The United States became the “Arsenal of Democracy;” it essentially supplied all its allies with the materials they needed to fight the war.  Initially the allied nations sent their gold to the United States for safe keeping.  But as the war continued they used that gold to buy food and materials to fight the war.  In time they spend all the gold and were still fighting the war.  Roosevelt came out with his “Lend Lease” plan, which was to continue to supply the Allied Nations in their fight against Germany, Japan, and Italy; the Axis Nations.

 

Actually the U.S. wanted to avoid the mistakes made during W.W.I.  Then, America lent money to the Allied Nations in its war against the Central Powers, Germany and Austria Hungary.  Most of that money was never repaid and led to bad feelings between the U.S. and its war allies.  Lend Lease was actually a gift to the Allied Nations.

 

It is estimated that the United States spent 1,075 trillion 1945 dollars in fighting W.W.II.  Where did all this wealth come from?  The answer would be from the Federal Reserve printing presses.  The amount of money merely denotes the productivity that was needed to win the war.

 

The Federal Government raised taxes and sold war bonds to raise money.  It rationed almost everything so that there was very little upon which to spend money.  After the war ended there was a burst of spending upon almost everything.  That and the government paying for many veterans to finish their education avoided the recession that followed W.W.I.

 

Basically what the government did was to print money as needed.  The gold certificates still existed even though they were basically a fiction.  No one questioned the situation because economic prosperity existed throughout the country.  The so-called process of paying for the war got the country out of the depression and brought about economic prosperity.

*********************************

When World War II ended in 1945 those areas where the war had been fought were a shambles.  They had undergone massive destruction from bombing and battles fought during the war.  Their infrastructure and much of their cities of Europe had been destroyed during the six years of warfare.

 

Politically the world emerged in 1945 with two political systems: one largely capitalistic led by the United States and one communistic led by the Union of Soviet Republics or Russia.  Russia was attempting to dominate the world by spreading its influence over non-communist countries.  It was felt in the United States that Russian efforts could be successfully countered by helping the war-torn countries return to prosperity.

 

The Marshall Plan or European Recovery Program (ERP) was introduced by George Marshall, the United States Secretary of State in June 1947 in an address at Harvard University.  It came into being by law on April 8, 1948.  Its objective was to rebuild war-devastated regions, remove trade barriers, modernize industry, make Europe prosperous once more, and prevent the spread of communism.  The United States gave over $13 billion.  This would be $130 billion in 2016 dollars to help rebuild Western Europe.  Approximately 26% went to the United Kingdom, 18% went to France, and 11% went to West Germany.  18 countries received Plan benefits.

 

In the United States taxes were not increased.  It did not increase the National Debt.  Where did this money come from?  The United States printed and issued it.  Actually what they issued to the different European countries were checkbooks with amounts of money that could be spent in the United States.  The Marshall Plan lasted four years.  Its result was to not only return Western Europe to prosperity it was also to maintain prosperity in the United States where most of this money was spent.

 

By arbitrationally issuing this money the United States brought prosperity to Western Europe and expanded it in the United States.  There were no financial upsets and no real inflation.  The basic money supply of U.S. currency was simply increased.  The conclusion this leads to is that this money was needed not only by the United States but also by the rest of the world.  It allowed for a massive expansion in national and international production.

The Weiner Component V.2 #32 – Pollution: Global Warming

Temperature predictions from some climate mode...

Temperature predictions from some climate models assuming the SRES A2 emissions scenario. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Great Global Warming Swindle

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Global Warming Map-tgk

Global Warming Map-tgk (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

If a person lights a fire in a fireplace in a small room, and the chimney flue is somehow blocked, the smoke will be trapped in the room, polluting it.  If the fire is allowed to continue to burn eventually the smoke in the room will become toxic.  If this is done in a large room the same process will take longer.  If an area is finite, no matter how large, the same effect will eventually result.  The difference will consist of a lot more toxic gases.  The Earth is the largest physical finite space we know of; it would require a tremendous amount of polluting gases to make it toxic.  But enough people over a large number of years releasing carbon-based polluting gases could and have achieve this.  The current population of the earth was approximately 7.5 billion people in April of 2017 and growing with three people being born for every single person who dies.  We may in some regions have currently reached the point of toxicity.

 

It has been argued that the planet goes through long warm and cold phases; and no doubt it does.  There have been warm rich volcanic exploding ages and frozen ice ages.  We are now in a period of gradual non-volcanic warming of the earth.  The ice at the poles is slowly melting.

 

Is this being caused by mankind daily sending millions of tons of polluting gases into the atmosphere which gradually has blocked much of the sun’s daily heat from dissipating back into space or is it occurring by a natural cycle?  The majority of people seem to blame man and his machines.  Individuals like Donald Trump and the Koch brothers who deal in oil production argue for a natural cycle.  Could it be a combination of the two?  Both contributing to a warming cycle, with man’s burning of polluting gases exacerbating the extent of the pollution and greatly increasing the rate of global warming.

 

My wife and I live on the West Coast about 40 miles from the ocean.  Recently in September we had a day when the heat wasn’t 100 degrees or hotter.  My wife complained that while it wasn’t hot enough to run the air conditioning it was still very muggy with the air filled with water vapor.  My comment was: Isn’t that what comes from global warming, moist air brought about by excess heat over the ocean?  She ran the air conditioning to take the moisture out of the air in our house.

 

These gases are not allowing much of the sun’s heat to dissipate, thus continually warming the earth.  The higher temperatures are generating storms by heating ocean currents and creating low pressure zones which absorb additional evaporation that create storms    like Hurricanes Harvey and Hurricane Irma which, in turn, are redistributing moisture, flooding cities like Huston in Texas, the fourth largest urban area in the United States.  Hurricane Irma has done the same thing in Florida and South Carolina.  While Harvey was a category 4 storm, Irma started as a category 5+ storm.  Winds of 157 miles per hour are considered a category 5.  Irma had winds of 187 mile per hour.  The East coast of the United States has never been hit by anything stronger than a category 3 storm.  On Sunday, September 10, after doing devastating damage throughout the Caribbean it came ashore in Florida as a category 6 storm with winds well over 150 miles an hour.

 

Is Hurricane Irma being caused by a single force or by a combination of forces?  Hurricane Irma has come up one week after Hurricane Harvey.  We have Hurricanes Jose, which is currently forming into a category 4 storm.  That makes ten hurricanes the United States has experienced so far this year.  We can conceivably have Hurricane Karen, and others this year.  Following Hurricane Irma by less than a week is Hurricane Jose.  Hurricane Irma is over four hundred miles wide.  It can and has covered the entire State of Florida.  We seem to be getting more and larger hurricanes.

 

The pole’s ice caps are melting, causing the oceans to very slowly rise.  The land surface very gradually decreases as the ice caps at the poles and glaciers decrease.  Is it wise to definitively say that the burning oil in the automobiles and otherwise are not affecting the atmosphere?  One can understand the position of the Koch Brothers and Donald Trump.  After all, they are businessmen and make a good part of their incomes and profits through the sale of oil.  One can even understand why Volkswagen cheated on the cars they sold, having the cars computer software purposely giving false information about the amount of pollutants each car was-throwing into the atmosphere.  After all their bottom line is profits; they are not really concerned with the condition of the planet.

 

Practically all scientists believe in the theory of man-caused global warming.  Because it is a theory and cannot be definitely proven there are global warming deniers.  It’s been my experience that these deniers generally have a vested interest in global warming not being man- induced.  Usually that interest is economic.

 

Historically there have been other scientific theories that could not be absolutely proven in the past.  One is the theory of evolution.  For a long period of time, when the Catholic Church had control of Europe the Theory of Evolution was heresy.  It went against the Church’s theory of the earth centered cosmos.  But as knowledge increased the Church rethought its theory.  There are still some religious groups today that deny evolution because it goes against the Biblical theory of creation.  I suspect the same thing will happen with the theory of man-made global change.

 

One can even understand why the oil companies are the chief financial supporters of the Republican Party, making generous continual contributions to them.  By legal definition political contributions are not bribes.  Consequently a goodly number of Republicans truly believe that the burnt oil pollution has nothing to do with weather conditions.  Of course an equal percentage of Republicans know better.  I suppose they are hypocrites.  But money is needed for political campaigns and they are all practical men.

 

One of the political comedians recently came out with the comment that some of the global warming deniers own vacation property in Florida that may be destroyed or seriously damaged by Hurricane Irma.  They may be facing a political or economic dilemma.

*************************************

Not too long ago President Trump visited Europe.  On the 7th and 8th of July 2017 the G20 2017 Summit took place in Hamburg, Germany.  Over 20 heads of government and representatives of international organizations met to discuss global warming.  President Trump, used this conference as an opportunity to directly communicate with Vladimir Putin, the Russian President.  Also since he believes man’s usage of oil products does not affect the environment he withdrew his country from future Summits.  The U.S. had been one of the leaders in this group; in essence under Donald Trump’s leadership it withdrew from a leadership position in the world.

 

However, people like Governor Jerry Brown of California and other leaders around the United States stated that they will continue the struggle to lessen pollution within the U.S.  So the United States representatives both left the G20 and largely stayed with it, following its goals.  If a Democratic President is elected in 2020 the country will be back officially in the G20.

***************************************

Hurricane Harvey negatively affected everyone living in Houston, Texas while Hurricane Irma did the same for everyone living in Florida and beyond.  It is estimated that 96 percent of the houses in the Florida Keys were damaged or destroyed by the storm.  Someone commented that the area looked like the aftermath of an atomic explosion.

 

The cost of the damage is in the multi-trillions of dollars.  The total effects of the damage may never be completely eradicated.  Once all the water that covering the city and state is gone and the cleanup and building replacement is done all the structures that survived the flooding will have a mold problem. No matter how much cleaning is done the people doing the cleaning will never get rid of all the mold.  All the inhabitants from these areas will be, among other things, breathing in mold.  Will that shorten some lives?

 

From what is now known now Hurricane Irma killed, going through the Caribbean and parts of the United States at least 46 people, mostly in the Caribbean.  In one old age nursing home six people died because of a loss of electric power.

 

Many people in the U.S. left the area before the storm arrived.  The storm left about nine million people without electric power.  Presumably all the power will be restored by September 22, ten days from now.  The storms turned streets into extensions of rivers.  People traveled by boat where before the storm they had walked or driven.

*******************************

When any sort of pollutants are used that effect human beings in a negative fashion a factor that comes into being is the social cost of the use of that resource or resources.  For example the burning of gasoline by vehicles produces impurities in the air that can cause respiratory problems when breathed in.  In addition the burnt gas blocks a percentage of earth’s heat from dissipating, exacerbating the warming of the earth.  This, in turn, causes an increase in global warming.  The social costs would be an increase in medical costs for the increasing poor health of the people involved as well as the cost of the physical damage done by the hurricanes.

 

We have no way of ascertaining what the level of the storms would be if the pollutants had not been present.  Hurricane Irma was one of the largest storms to ever come through the area.  Would it have been a category 3 or 2 hurricane or would it have just been a storm if there had been no global warming?  The fact remains that the storms, at least in part, are caused by the pollutants in the atmosphere.  I doubt that a scientist can be found to dispute that.

 

If the social costs exceed the profits made in producing and selling the gasoline then the general public is taking a tremendous economic and health loss in the use of a particular resource.  They are being forced to assume the social costs brought about by the use of gasoline.  Alternate forms of energy that are harmless to the environment need to be found.  One way to encourage this would be in the form of numerous class action law suits against the companies that produce and sell the gasoline.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Weiner Component V.2 #31 – The Significance of the Arpaio Pardon

Map of Arizona highlighting Maricopa County

Map of Arizona highlighting Maricopa County (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On Friday, August 25, 2017, President Donald J. Trump pardoned the misdemeanor conviction of Joe Arpaio, the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona.  He was found guilty of criminal contempt by a Judge after illegally targeting Latinos, a group that constitutes about 1/3 of the population of Arizona, as illegal immigrants.  The sentencing phase of his trial was due on October 5, 2017.  He could have gotten up to six months in confinement.

 

Apparently Trump did not clear the pardon with his Justice Department.  He assumed that as President he could just issue a pardon.  While Arpaio may have acted criminally as sheriff he was not accused of breaking any law.  Instead he was found guilty of criminal contempt.  He has systematically refused to obey Court Orders.  This was his crime.

 

The government of the United States is set-up in three parts.  Each of the parts serves as a check upon the other two sections.  Trump pardoned Arpaio of refusing part of the system of checks and balances.  Basically he abrogated the power of the Courts given to them by the Constitution.  Does the Constitution give him the power to weaken itself?

 

Listening to Trump and Arpaio after the pardon had been issued one got the impression that neither of these two understood the significance of the Constitution.  Both spoke of the case having gone away like it never existed.  When former President Richard Nixon accepted a pardoned in 1974 from then President Gerald Ford, even though he had never been tried or convicted of any crime, he acknowledged that he was guilty of participating in the Watergate burglary and cover-up.  Former sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, by accepting Trump’s pardon, officially admitted that he was guilty of the Contempt of Court charge, that he had practiced racial profiling as sheriff and had refused to follow court orders to stop the practice, that he, in a manner of speaking had abrogated the concept of checks and balances between the three different parts of government: the administration, the legislative, and the courts.

 

With Trump’s pardon the criminal case had presumably ended.  Arpaio’s pardon was an admission of guilt. By accepting the pardon Joseph Michael (Joe) Arpaio had admitted guilt; he had made innumerable arrests and jailing’s based upon racial profiling.  This action would also be true for all people of color.  I would assume that virtually every Latino and Black who had been arbitrarily stopped, hassled, possibly arrested and jailed in the years from 1993 to 2016, the years Arpaio was sheriff, could sue both him and the county for racial profiling.  In fact it would make a splendid class action suit.  The ACLU or even some private law firm could take the case.  To date there have been over 44 million dollars paid out to individuals that Joe Arpaio had had arrested, jailed, or otherwise mistreated.  This included newspaper reporters to Latinos who were born and live in Maricopa County.

 

One should also keep in mind that according to the July 1, 2016 Census the state of Arizona has, out of a population of 6,931,071, 30.9% Latinos.  We should also keep in mind that at that time 4.9% of the population was Black.  That means that just from his own state he had about two million, four hundred and ninety thousand people upon which to pick.  I would also suspect that even though the majority of the state votes mostly Republican there has been quite a lot of voter suppression.

 

A massive class-action law suit, particularly one in the billions of dollars, would send a very clear message throughout the United States.  If racial profiling became too expensive it would definitely be dropped throughout the nation.

**************************************

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is 85 years old.  He has been the country’s “toughest sheriff,” according to his own testimony, from 1993 through 2016, for 23 years.  He was voted out of office in 2016.  He had served 6 terms.

 

Starting in 2005 Arpaio took an outspoken stance against illegal immigration.  He is also known for his investigation of former President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.  After sending, at taxpayer expense, one or more investigators to Hawaii to examine the President’s birth certificate. Since they found one he claimed it was forged.

 

Arpaio has been accused of various types of police misconduct, including abuse of power, misuse of funds, failure to investigate sex crimes; improper clearance of cases, unlawful enforcement of immigration laws, and election law violations.  A Federal court monitor was appointed to oversee his office’s operations because of complaints of racial profiling.  The U.S. Department of Justice concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in U.S. history and filed suit against him for unlawful discriminatory police conduct.

 

Over his law enforcement career Arpaio cost the county over 44 million dollars in lawsuits over illegal abuses perpetrated upon the press and citizens.  In essence Joseph Michael Arpaio ruled Maricopa County, Arizona like a little Hitler, interpreting the law to fit his prejudices.  This is the man that on August 25, 2017, President Donald Trump pardoned from a possible six month incarceration.

 

Despite numerous Court Orders to end racial profiling Joe Arpaio continued the process, essentially ignoring Court Orders.  In 2016 Arpaio lost the election for sheriff. The office went to the Democratic candidate, Paul Penzone with 56% of the vote.  Arpaio received 44%.  Apparently the sheriff wasn’t able to frighten away enough minority voters in that election.

 

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton in another hearing said that evidence demonstrates that Arpaio’s “flagrant disregard” for another Judge’s order that halted Arpaio’s signature immigration roundups, was guilty of illegal action.  The sentencing phase was to begin October 5, 2017.  Arpaio faced up to six months in confinement for ignoring the order.  The contempt charge was a misdemeanor.  Since he had committed a Federal crime he presumably came under the jurisdiction of President Trump.  Trump pardoned him stating that he had spent years enforcing the laws and he should be rewarded not punished.

 

Why did Trump pardon Arpaio?  For one thing they had both several years earlier denounced President Barack Obama as not being born in the United States.  They had both presumably sent people to Hawaii to prove this, Arpaio literally and Trump only verbally.  In addition it would seem that Trump was sending a message to all his relatives and cohorts that if they were arrested and tried for any crimes he would pardon them.  This included any of his supporters who had had relations of any sort with Russia both before and during the Presidential Election of 2016.  It could include both family members and participants who helped him get elected.  The special counsel, Robert Mueller, has been investigating the election and has impounded two separate Grand Jurys.

 

According to John McCain, Joe Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt after illegally targeting Hispanics.  Trump’s pardon “willfully violated” a 2011 Court Order barring him from detaining individuals solely on suspicion about their legal status based solely on their ethnicity.  The President undermined professed respect for the rule of law.

 

McCain stated, “No one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold.  Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based upon their perceived immigration status in violation of the judge’s orders.”

 

Obviously the move was blatantly political.  Arizona’s leading newspaper as well as many others in the state denounced Trump’s move.  “The vast majority of Latinos in Arizona are not undocumented, yet they all fell under heightened scrutiny, “the editorial stated.

***********************************

Trump’s pardon occurred while a hurricane was approaching Huston, Texas.  The President announced it then, he said, because it would get the most media coverage at that time.

 

While the Constitution gives the President the pardoning power it does not define the extent of this power.  Trump apparently interpreted it to mean unlimited power to grant pardons.  But the Constitution was set up with a system of checks and balances which, in turn, keep any one segment of the Federal Government from taking over control.  There is an executive, a legislature, and a court system.  Each serves as a check upon the other two parts of the Federal Government.  When Trump pardoned Arpaio he encroached upon this system of checks and balances.

 

Arpaio was not forgiven for breaking a law, which he did do, but for invalidating a Court Contempt charge.  He pardoned a legal decision by a Judge.  In doing this he abrogated one of the checks and balances of our legal system.  Does he have the authority to do that?

 

Judge Susan Bolton of the U.S. District Court, handling the Arpaio’s case has cancelled a sentencing hearing for the former sheriff but stopped short of throwing out his conviction.  She stated that because a presidential pardon carries the implication of guilt she wants both Mr. Arpaio’s lawyers and the U.S. Department of Justice to submit briefs on why she should or should not vacate Mr. Arpaio’s conviction.  The arguments have been scheduled for October 4th.    She will make a decision at that time.

 

In addition House of Representatives Democrats on the Judiciary Committee are demanding a hearing on the Arpaio pardon.  Mr. Arpaio is also currently appealing his conviction.  Appeals and pardons cannot occur at the same time.  The case is far from being over.  It has yet to be determined if the pardon was legal.

 

Was the pardon legal?  The Constitution gives the pardoning power to the President.  It does not define that power.  Up to that decision all pardoning cases dealt with the breakage of a law brought into existence by the legislative body, Congress.  This case deals with a Court decision.  That power is inherent in the Constitution.  Does the President have the power to override a power given by the Constitution?  That ultimate decision rests with the Supreme Court, the ultimate definer of the Constitution.  Whatever Judge Susan Bolton decides, the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.  There five Justices are conservative and four are liberal.  However two of the conservative Justices, Kennedy and Roberts, have occasionally voted with the four liberal ones.  In any case will the Supreme Court vote to limit its own power?

The Weiner Component V.2 #30 – Trump & Afghanistan

On Monday, August 21, 2017, President Donald J. Trump gave a foreign policy speech dealing with Afghanistan.  It stated that there would be a continuation of our troops being there and that at some near point in the future more troops would be added to our presence.  The Afghanistan War, if it is a war in the strict sense of the term, is to date the longest war or military action in which the United States has ever been involved, it has now lasted 16 years.  Of course one could argue that we are still at war with North Korea since we have had troops stationed at their border since 1953 when a truce was declared.

 

The issue with Afghanistan is rather complex.  President Trump edited out a lot of information in his presentation.  It will be useful to consider some of these facts.

 

Shortly after the terrorist assault and destruction upon the Twin Towers in New York City on 9/11/01 the U.S. military attacked Afghanistan which was then ruled by the Taliban.  The terrorist raid upon America was organized from there.  While that war was going on the U.S. also attacked Iraq, a country which presumably had weapons of mass destruction.  To President Bush, his Vice President, Dick Cheney, and his Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, this was an ideal opportunity to remake both of these nations into copies of the United States.

 

Unfortunately by the American leaders there was no understanding of either of these countries or of their cultures or people.  Iraq was then ruled by Saddam Hussein, a dictator.  The country was quickly militarily taken over and a new government was established by the U.S.  One of the major problems of the new Iraqi government was that it functioned by favoritism, nepotism, and corruption.  For another thing the new government instead of treating all its citizens equally favored the Shiites over the Sunnis, one major religious sect over the other.

 

These forces that existed in both the military and the government put people in positions of authority regardless of their capabilities.  In the army it chose its officers in this fashion, meaning the military corps were essentially led by incompetents.  Given a combat situation they would probably be the first to run, leading to mass desertions during battles, particularly against determined fighters.

 

The Iraqi example of corruption that stands out was a large building put up by an Iraqi contractor and paid for by the U.S. government on the edge of the desert.  The building, when finished cost millions of dollars and was never used.  It’s probably become part of the desert today.  It seems that the builder, in order to increase his profits, minimized the amount of concrete mixed with the sand to such an extent that when water hit a part of the building it dissolved the concrete.  And it does at intervals rain there.  It was never safe to enter the structure because any part could dissolve at any time.  The probability was that the builder pocketed his profits without any complaints.  This is one blaring example, there are countless others.

 

In battle, when the Iraqi military faced determined fighters like ISIS, they would throw down their weapons and flee the scene.  The Iraqi President demanded that if the Americans stayed in Iraq they came under the legal jurisdiction of the Iraqi civilian legal system.  The American army has its own code of military laws which would try American soldiers for infractions of the laws.  They would not put their men under Iraqi jurisdiction.  Consequently, as the Iraqis wished, the United States began removing its army from Iraq.

 

Essentially the same thing happened in Afghanistan.  Under President Barack Obama the troops were being removed from that country.  Both Iraq and Afghanistan had been able to order the U.S. around but their governments were not strong enough to hold their territories against the Taliban, ISIS, and Al-Qaida.  This has necessitated the return of American troops and the continued war in these countries.

 

Presumably today, there have been improvements.  The American troops serve as advisers.  President Trump, in Afghanistan, wants them to kill members of the terrorist groups, that is, to go back to a combat mission and win the war.

 

Is it really a war?  Or are we holding these territories for governments that are not really capable of controlling their own land?  If this is true then we are stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan for the duration, however long that may be.

************************************

Trump’s new strategy for war in Afghanistan is very similar to Obama’s old strategy.  A large number, possibly 4,000 or more American soldiers will be added at some point in the near future bringing our military forces there to just over twelve thousand men.  The U.S. will, according to President Trump, presumably quickly kill the enemy and win the war.     The actual probability is that the enemy will then fade away, essentially leave the country during the American buildup and then return when the U.S. removes most of the troops.  They’ve done this before.

 

What will it take to change this pattern?  And is it possible?  Can the Afghanistan’s stand up to their radical forces?  This was President Obama’s plan.  If we again take up the war and fight it will we be actually doing Afghanistan a favor or encouraging their traditional position?

 

In point of fact, is it really a war that is being fought in Afghanistan or are we just maintaining the status quo?  Will these countries ever be strong enough to maintain their own security?  That’s an interesting question.  Can it be answered at present?

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld shares a ...

The Weiner Component V.2 #29 – The Pattern of United States History & the Evolving Purpose of Government: Part 2

Unemployment rate in the US 1910–1960, with th...

Unemployment rate in the US 1910–1960, with the years of the Great Depression (1929–1939) highlighted. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Herbert Hoover was elected President of the United States in 1928.  He

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1933. Lietuvių: Fra...

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1933. Lietuvių: Franklinas Delanas Ruzveltas (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

was the third Republican elected to the presidency since the end of World War I, taking office in March 4, 1929.  The Great Depression began on September 4, 1929, with a fall in stock prices.  The stock market crashed on October 29, 1929, Black Tuesday.  It would continue to drop thereafter, losing billions of dollars in value.

English: Real National Product in the Great De...

English: Real National Product in the Great Depression (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Hoover was President about seven months before the crash came.  He spent the next three and some years contending unsuccessfully with the Great Depression and waiting for the Stock Market to reverse itself into positive territory.  It never did.

 

From October 29th on the Great Depression became a world phenomenon.   It had devastating effects.  Personal incomes, tax revenues, profits and prices dropped.  International trade plunged more than 50%.  Countries had set up tariff barriers against all other nations.

 

Both poor and rich suffered.  Personal income tax revenues, profits and prices fell.  Unemployment in the United States dropped to 25%.  It was higher in some other countries, reaching 33%.  Farming areas suffered as crop-prices fell 60%.  All this began eight months after Hoover became President of the United States and continued to get worse during his presidency.

 

Once the Depression hit, Hoover, as President attempted to combat the economic decline with large scale government public work projects such as the Hoover Dam.  He urged industry to keep wages high.  Reluctantly he approved the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 which set up international trade barriers.  Because he believed in a balanced budget as government income from taxes fell, he raised the rate.   The economy kept falling and unemployment gradually rose to 25%.

 

What had happened was that the economy fell like a bolder off the roof of a high building.  On the one hand President Hoover tried to continually add money to the economy but on the other hand he massively decreased the amount of money available to the public by continually trying to balance the National budget.  The basic problem was that no one really understood what was happening.  By continually decreasing the money available Hoover exacerbated the depths of the depression.  In 2008, when a similar situation occurred the President increased government spending by trillions of dollars and did not raise taxes.  What should have been a greater depression than that of 1929 became instead a Great Recession from which the country recovered in a few years.  Economic downturns are generally understood today; their causes and effects weren’t in 1929.

***************************************

The Great Depression of 1929 was mainly caused by the unregulated banks.  They allowed stock to be purchased with a margin of 10 percent of the actual cost of the stock, the bank funding the remaining 90 percent with interest.  This allowed innumerable people to invest in the Stock Market.  The banks held the stock.  If its cost went down the so-called owner had to quickly come up with the difference raising the bank’s holding to 90 percent or they would sell the stock.  This was buying on margin.

 

The system created high false values on the stocks, producing a bubble which would at some point collapse.  Stocks that never paid a dividend were selling for ever rising costs.  Sooner or later a crash had to come.

 

When the Crash came on October 29, 1929, Black Tuesday, the majority of stocks dropped quickly far lower than 10 percent in one day and continued dropping on succeeding days.  A large number of stockholders were suddenly bankrupt and a lot of banks went out of business.

 

Overnight the amount of money in circulation decreased by a massive percentage and the country was in a deeper depression than it had ever been in before.  This was the Great Depression that would last until shortly after the outbreak of World War II.  What pulled the United States and other countries out of the Great Depression was the unlimited war spending.

***********************************

On March 4, 1933 Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office as the first elected Democratic President since the end of World War I.  In the preceding campaign he had promised the country a “New Deal.”  It was a term that came from poker; the player gave up his five cards and received five new ones with which to play.  It was to the American people a promise of a complete change.  What the change would be, no one knew at the time.  I suspect that included the President; but he would experiment and find a way through the economic crisis.

 

The New Deal consisted of what Roosevelt called the 3Rs: Relief, Recovery, and Reform.  Relief was to create jobs for the unemployed, Recovery was to bring the economy back to a state of health, and Reform was to pass laws that regulated the banks and other enterprises that brought about the Great Depression.  It was felt that the overall economy had to be changed so that this condition could never happen again.

 

Initially Roosevelt closed all the banks and quickly began a process of auditing them.  He began his fireside chats over the new invention, radio, stating in one of his early talks that “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.”  He talked the nation through its fears.  During the first hundred days Congress passed bills that were largely blank, just having a title.  They were filled in by what was needed as they went into operation.

 

Roosevelt doubled the money supply by collecting all the gold coins, with the exception of a few held back as souvenirs.  People objected to having to turn in their gold coins for paper money.  The Federal Government sued them and won every case.  The gold was melted down and made into blocks which were then put into depositories like Fort Knox.  Gold paper certificates were then issued and kept by the Federal Reserve that denoted the amount of gold that was stored.

 

Ones and five dollar bills were silver certificates.  Ten dollar bills and up were gold certificates, actually Federal Reserve Notes.  Once this was completed the government had doubled its money supply.  Actually once this was done the country was off the gold standard.  It solved one major problem.  There had never been enough gold available to meet the monetary needs of the economy.  From this point on we were off the gold standard.  The theoretical fact that we, as a nation, were on one was a fiction.  Paper money could not be exchanged for gold.

 

What emerged as the New Deal developed was a series of Federal programs, public work projects, financial reforms and regulations enacted by the Roosevelt administration in response to the Great Depression.  These programs included support to the farmers, the unemployed, youth and the elderly.  It also included bank reform and changes to the monetary system.  They included both laws passed by Congress, and Presidential executive orders.  These programs focused on Relief, Recovery, and Reform.

 

In essence what Roosevelt did was to change the focus of the Federal Government.  From this point on it assumed responsibility for the welfare of its population.  It didn’t matter up until 2017 which political party was in control the new focus was kept up and added to by both political parties.  The Federal Government’s responsibility was to the people of the nation, to their welfare.  With the election of Donald J. Trump on January 20th on the government seemed to be attempting to move back in time to before 1929.  To date it hasn’t succeeded.

************************************

Harry S. Truman, who became President with the death of Roosevelt, and then won the next election for the Presidency introduced the “Fair Deal.”  It was a liberal extension of the New Deal.  Unfortunately, during his early presidency both houses of Congress were controlled by the Republicans.  What was achieved were those aspects of which the Republicans approved.

 

The Fair Deal included federal aid to education, a large tax cut for low income earners, abolition of the poll tax, an anti-lynching law, a farm aid program, increased public housing, an immigration bill, new TVA style public works projects, a new Department of Welfare, an increase in the minimum wage from 40 cents to 75 cents an hour, national health insurance, expanded Social Security coverage, and a $4 billion tax increase to reduce the national debt and pay for these programs.

 

A very small number of these items were passed by the Republican Congress.  In 1949 to 1950 there was a Democratic Congress and some more of these items were passed.

 

President Lyndon B. Johnson got a number of these reforms passed in his Great Society plan.  Medicare came into existence for senior citizens, with former President Harry S Truman getting the first card issued with the number 1.  Medicaid for the poor who could not afford proper medical care.  A number of civil rights and voter laws were passed desegregating the Southern States.  Johnson declared “War on poverty,” but was hampered in his domestic program by the Viet Nam War.  George W. Bush, the Republican President, added a 400 million dollar prescription drug bill to Medicare.

 

Finally under President Barack Obama in the early 21st Century Affordable Health Care came into existence.  Currently under President Donald J. Trump the country seems to be attempting to move backwards to a time before the New Deal.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

To sum up: President Herbert Hoover spent millions on public works trying to help the nation quickly work itself through the Great Depression.  He didn’t want the government to directly give charity because that would destroy individual initiative.  President Franklin D. Roosevelt spent billions.  He doubled the money supply.  His policy was Relief, Recovery, and Reform: the three R’s.  There was some of each but the Great Depression did not completely end until the 1940s with World War II where spending was endless.  In 2008 the Real Estate Bubble, brought about by the banks over a 28 year period, burst and the value of the dollar dropped to about ten cents.  President George W. Bush initially bailed out the banks and then Barack Obama became President in 2009.  The country faced a potential for a depression far worse than the Great Depression.  President Obama spent trillions and the country faced a Great Recession which mainly ended a few years later.  We had learned how to limit depressions.

The Weiner Component V.2 #29 – The Pattern of United States History & the Evolving Purpose of Government: Part 2

 

Herbert Hoover was elected President of the United States in 1928.  He was the third Republican elected to the presidency since the end of World War I, taking office in March 4, 1929.  The Great Depression began on September 4, 1929, with a fall in stock prices.  The stock market crashed on October 29, 1929, Black Tuesday.  It would continue to drop thereafter, losing billions of dollars in value.

 

Hoover was President about seven months before the crash came.  He spent the next three and some years contending unsuccessfully with the Great Depression and waiting for the Stock Market to reverse itself into positive territory.  It never did.

 

From October 29th on the Great Depression became a world phenomenon.   It had devastating effects.  Personal incomes, tax revenues, profits and prices dropped.  International trade plunged more than 50%.  Countries had set up tariff barriers against all other nations.

 

Both poor and rich suffered.  Personal income tax revenues, profits and prices fell.  Unemployment in the United States dropped to 25%.  It was higher in some other countries, reaching 33%.  Farming areas suffered as crop-prices fell 60%.  All this began eight months after Hoover became President of the United States and continued to get worse during his presidency.

 

Once the Depression hit, Hoover, as President attempted to combat the economic decline with large scale government public work projects such as the Hoover Dam.  He urged industry to keep wages high.  Reluctantly he approved the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 which set up international trade barriers.  Because he believed in a balanced budget as government income from taxes fell, he raised the rate.   The economy kept falling and unemployment gradually rose to 25%.

 

What had happened was that the economy fell like a bolder off the roof of a high building.  On the one hand President Hoover tried to continually add money to the economy but on the other hand he massively decreased the amount of money available to the public by continually trying to balance the National budget.  The basic problem was that no one really understood what was happening.  By continually decreasing the money available Hoover exacerbated the depths of the depression.  In 2008, when a similar situation occurred the President increased government spending by trillions of dollars and did not raise taxes.  What should have been a greater depression than that of 1929 became instead a Great Recession from which the country recovered in a few years.  Economic downturns are generally understood today; their causes and effects weren’t in 1929.

***************************************

The Great Depression of 1929 was mainly caused by the unregulated banks.  They allowed stock to be purchased with a margin of 10 percent of the actual cost of the stock, the bank funding the remaining 90 percent with interest.  This allowed innumerable people to invest in the Stock Market.  The banks held the stock.  If its cost went down the so-called owner had to quickly come up with the difference raising the bank’s holding to 90 percent or they would sell the stock.  This was buying on margin.

 

The system created high false values on the stocks, producing a bubble which would at some point collapse.  Stocks that never paid a dividend were selling for ever rising costs.  Sooner or later a crash had to come.

 

When the Crash came on October 29, 1929, Black Tuesday, the majority of stocks dropped quickly far lower than 10 percent in one day and continued dropping on succeeding days.  A large number of stockholders were suddenly bankrupt and a lot of banks went out of business.

 

Overnight the amount of money in circulation decreased by a massive percentage and the country was in a deeper depression than it had ever been in before.  This was the Great Depression that would last until shortly after the outbreak of World War II.  What pulled the United States and other countries out of the Great Depression was the unlimited war spending.

***********************************

On March 4, 1933 Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office as the first elected Democratic President since the end of World War I.  In the preceding campaign he had promised the country a “New Deal.”  It was a term that came from poker; the player gave up his five cards and received five new ones with which to play.  It was to the American people a promise of a complete change.  What the change would be, no one knew at the time.  I suspect that included the President; but he would experiment and find a way through the economic crisis.

 

The New Deal consisted of what Roosevelt called the 3Rs: Relief, Recovery, and Reform.  Relief was to create jobs for the unemployed, Recovery was to bring the economy back to a state of health, and Reform was to pass laws that regulated the banks and other enterprises that brought about the Great Depression.  It was felt that the overall economy had to be changed so that this condition could never happen again.

 

Initially Roosevelt closed all the banks and quickly began a process of auditing them.  He began his fireside chats over the new invention, radio, stating in one of his early talks that “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.”  He talked the nation through its fears.  During the first hundred days Congress passed bills that were largely blank, just having a title.  They were filled in by what was needed as they went into operation.

 

Roosevelt doubled the money supply by collecting all the gold coins, with the exception of a few held back as souvenirs.  People objected to having to turn in their gold coins for paper money.  The Federal Government sued them and won every case.  The gold was melted down and made into blocks which were then put into depositories like Fort Knox.  Gold paper certificates were then issued and kept by the Federal Reserve that denoted the amount of gold that was stored.

 

Ones and five dollar bills were silver certificates.  Ten dollar bills and up were gold certificates, actually Federal Reserve Notes.  Once this was completed the government had doubled its money supply.  Actually once this was done the country was off the gold standard.  It solved one major problem.  There had never been enough gold available to meet the monetary needs of the economy.  From this point on we were off the gold standard.  The theoretical fact that we, as a nation, were on one was a fiction.  Paper money could not be exchanged for gold.

 

What emerged as the New Deal developed was a series of Federal programs, public work projects, financial reforms and regulations enacted by the Roosevelt administration in response to the Great Depression.  These programs included support to the farmers, the unemployed, youth and the elderly.  It also included bank reform and changes to the monetary system.  They included both laws passed by Congress, and Presidential executive orders.  These programs focused on Relief, Recovery, and Reform.

 

In essence what Roosevelt did was to change the focus of the Federal Government.  From this point on it assumed responsibility for the welfare of its population.  It didn’t matter up until 2017 which political party was in control the new focus was kept up and added to by both political parties.  The Federal Government’s responsibility was to the people of the nation, to their welfare.  With the election of Donald J. Trump on January 20th on the government seemed to be attempting to move back in time to before 1929.  To date it hasn’t succeeded.

************************************

Harry S. Truman, who became President with the death of Roosevelt, and then won the next election for the Presidency introduced the “Fair Deal.”  It was a liberal extension of the New Deal.  Unfortunately, during his early presidency both houses of Congress were controlled by the Republicans.  What was achieved were those aspects of which the Republicans approved.

 

The Fair Deal included federal aid to education, a large tax cut for low income earners, abolition of the poll tax, an anti-lynching law, a farm aid program, increased public housing, an immigration bill, new TVA style public works projects, a new Department of Welfare, an increase in the minimum wage from 40 cents to 75 cents an hour, national health insurance, expanded Social Security coverage, and a $4 billion tax increase to reduce the national debt and pay for these programs.

 

A very small number of these items were passed by the Republican Congress.  In 1949 to 1950 there was a Democratic Congress and some more of these items were passed.

 

President Lyndon B. Johnson got a number of these reforms passed in his Great Society plan.  Medicare came into existence for senior citizens, with former President Harry S Truman getting the first card issued with the number 1.  Medicaid for the poor who could not afford proper medical care.  A number of civil rights and voter laws were passed desegregating the Southern States.  Johnson declared “War on poverty,” but was hampered in his domestic program by the Viet Nam War.  George W. Bush, the Republican President, added a 400 million dollar prescription drug bill to Medicare.

 

Finally under President Barack Obama in the early 21st Century Affordable Health Care came into existence.  Currently under President Donald J. Trump the country seems to be attempting to move backwards to a time before the New Deal.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

To sum up: President Herbert Hoover spent millions on public works trying to help the nation quickly work itself through the Great Depression.  He didn’t want the government to directly give charity because that would destroy individual initiative.  President Franklin D. Roosevelt spent billions.  He doubled the money supply.  His policy was Relief, Recovery, and Reform: the three R’s.  There was some of each but the Great Depression did not completely end until the 1940s with World War II where spending was endless.  In 2008 the Real Estate Bubble, brought about by the banks over a 28 year period, burst and the value of the dollar dropped to about ten cents.  President George W. Bush initially bailed out the banks and then Barack Obama became President in 2009.  The country faced a potential for a depression far worse than the Great Depression.  President Obama spent trillions and the country faced a Great Recession which mainly ended a few years later.  We had learned how to limit depressions.

The Weiner Component V.2 #28 – The Pattern of U.S. History & the Evolving Purpose of Government: Part 1

The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 178...

The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781. This was the format for the United States government until the Constitution. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The order in which the original 13 states rati...

The order in which the original 13 states ratified the constitution, then the order in which the others were admitted to the union (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The issue here is to discern the pattern(s) of U.S. history and ascertain   the purpose of the Federal and State Governments?  For what are they or should they be responsible.  And how has this changed over the years?

 

Historically during America’s Colonial Period people came for religious freedom which they did not generally extend to those with different beliefs once they were established in their own colony or they came for economic opportunities in order to exist in a non-fixed society where they could achieve goals not possible in Europe.  Here one could gain ownership of land and possibly prosper.  Many also were brought as indentured servants or as slaves.

 

It was to most of these people a New World with new opportunities that did not exist in the Old World, Europe.  The Colonial Governments provided the opportunities and if the settlers could properly utilize them they could make a new life for themselves and for their families.

 

In time, going from the 16th Century to the late 18th Century the settlements and society became more complicated.  On the East coast, in the Americas, Great Britain had gained control of most of the colonies.  By the last quarter of the 18th Century the British Colonies below Canada and above Florida no longer wanted to be ruled as dependent colonies, totally relying upon the mother country.  The immediate problem was taxes decreed by King George III and his Parliament.  This protest brought about the Revolutionary War.

 

When it became clear to England, after the Battle at Yorktown in Virginia on October 19, 1781, that it was too expensive in both gold and men to occupy the American Colonies with an army perennially the British gave the 13 Colonies their independence.  It was cheaper and more practical to simply trade with them.  What was to develop from that was the United States of America.

**********************************

The overall purpose of the new state governments, under the Articles of Confederation, was to allow their populations to develop as best they could with the governments essentially providing safety from foreign invasions and keeping order within the individual states.

 

Each state was virtually an independent nation with essentially a largely powerless Congress made up of representatives from all the different governments.  They each could print or mint their own money.  They agreed to cooperate but essentially kept their own sovereignty.  The members of the unified Congress had to go back to their individual state legislatures for decisions over major bills.  And all bills required unanimous approval in order to come into being.  There was no executive office; Congress also had this function. This period lasted from the end of the Revolutionary War until 1788, when the Constitution was ratified and a new government established.

 

What brought the Constitution into being was mainly Shay’s Rebellion, which lasted from 1786 through 1787.  The coastal mercantile class that controlled the government in the State of Massachusetts, in order to raise money, passed a tax to be paid by the small inland farmers who were not represented in the State Legislature and tended to be short of cash.  The tax was vigorously collected, causing tax collectors to seize and auction off land in payment of debts.  During this period many people argued that since the large plantation owners in the Southern states had refused to pay their debts to English merchants, that they had amassed before the Revolutionary War they, the small farmers, could do the same thing to the state of Massachusetts.  This tended to raise fears among the property owning class throughout the new country and brought about for many an awareness of a need for a strong central government that could enforce its will.  It brought about the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 which was chaired by George Washington.

 

In 12 of the 13 states a new government came into existence in 1789 with the election of George Washington as its first President.  In Massachusetts a year earlier the state government was reformed.  Shay’s Rebellion had been one of the major motivating forces for the formation of the Constitution.  Henceforth life, liberty, and the protection of property became the creed of the new government.

 

The Constitution came into effect after 9 states approved it.  12 of the 13 states actually voted for it.  Rhode Island did not send any delegates to the Constitutional Convention and did not approve it.  It held a number of conventions within the state and did not approve the new government in any of them.  Finally in 1790 the Congress of the New United States voted to exclude Rhode Island in the near future from any participation with the other 12 states, thus totally isolating them.  On May 18, 1790, before this bill could come into effect, Rhode Island approved the Constitution and joined the Union.

 

The new government that came into being under the Constitution was run by both the educated and mercantile class.  These people formed the Federalist Party.  They were the elite.  In this government only male property owners could vote.  This group constituted the first political party.  While they ran the country for everyone’s benefit they favored their own class.  The function of government was the same as it had been under the Articles of Confederation.

************************************

In 1800 a new political party was formed under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson, the Democratic Republican Party.  Jefferson favored the yeoman/small family farmer.  During a dramatic election with all sorts of denouncement from both sides the Democratic Party won; Jefferson was elected President.  It was still government by the elite; but mainly for the benefit of the small farmer.

 

In point of fact Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory from Napoleon and France.  The sale was technically illegal because the French had promised Spain, the original owner that they would not sell the territory; but there was nothing Spain could do about it since at that time she was ruled by one of Napoleon’s Marshalls and had been conquered by France.

 

To Jefferson the Louisiana Territory extended the new United States’ land area so that there would be land for yeoman farmers, in President Jefferson’s opinion, for the next hundred years.

 

After the War of 1812 the Federalist Party disappeared.  It backed the wrong side in that war, England.  It would not really appear again until 1860 under the new name of the Republican Party.

**********************************

With the election of Andrew Jackson to the Presidency from 1828 to 1837 Democracy was spelt with a small d.  By then practically all males voted.  Land was cheap and practically all males owned some.  The vote was essentially universal for males.  In addition the Union had grown from the original 12 to 24 states.  And the Democratic Party had split into Jacksonian Democrats and Non-Jacksonian Democrats.

 

With Jackson the concept of rule by the elite disappeared.  President Jackson was considered by the population as one of their own.  He was the common man elevated to the Presidency and his government extended that concept with what was called the “spoils system,” whereby anyone could hold any government job.  It was now, to pre-quote Lincoln, “a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”  Its overall purpose remained the same as it had been before: the government provided what was necessary in the country to exist, the people had the opportunity to make use of what the government provided.

*********************************

With the earlier invention and dissemination of the Cotton Gin slavery, which had been dying out, became the means for the Southern states to raise cotton.  Cotton became the chief export of the large Southern planters.  It fostered the new Industrial Revolution and made slavery again important in the Southern States.  Spinning thread and weaving inexpensive cloth became the first major industry of the new Industrial Revolution.

 

At first England controlled this new industry; then it spread to the rest of Europe and the Northern parts of the United States.  The new Industrial Revolution was begun by an industry based initially upon slavery in the Southern United States.  To them Cotton was King.  It reestablished slavery as an economic system.

 

Gradually the Non-Jacksonian Democrats became a myriad of political parties.  The largest pro-business party was the Whigs.  Another was the Abolitionists which consisted of those who were against slavery.  There were innumerable others; some lasted a short period of time and disappeared, others persisted.  By 1860 the Whig, the abolitionists, and innumerable other smaller parties coalesced into the Republican Party and because the Democratic Party split into two political parts, the Northern and Southern Democrats, the new Republican Party won the Presidential Election with 40% of the vote and Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican President of the United States.

 

Lincoln’s name was not on the ballot in any Southern state.  The election consisted of two separate elections; one in the Northern and Western States and one in the Southern States.

 

This began the Civil War and the one question that had never been settled when the nation was first established under the Constitution was resolved by the outcome of the war: Who was more powerful the States or the Central Government?  In addition slavery was ended.

**********************************

After the Civil War America went rapidly through the Industrial Revolution.  The railroads covered the nation, industry rose rapidly, there was the very rapid rise of new cities and the phenomenal growth of the old ones.  The country underwent rapid change with the growth of monopolies and oligopolies.  Actually practically every industry by the end of the 19th Century had become a monopoly with one of its lawyers having a seat in the U.S. Senate.  Just about all the state legislatures were prone to bribery.  Rockefeller’s Standard oil not only had a reputation of refining oil it also refined state legislatures.

 

Initially the state legislatures elected the members of the Senate; they were to serve the needs of the individual states.  The 17th Amendment to the Constitution was passed in 1913.  It caused the members of the Senate to be elected by the direct vote of the people of the respective states.

 

It was during this period that the nation changed from a rural country with cities to an urban one with rural areas that produced the necessary food for the population.  The changes were so rapid that the support systems and support laws had to be developed with and after the changes.  Proper water for the people of the cities, evacuation of sewerage, building regulations, proper ventilation, a sane workday in the factories, rules for the employment of women and children, and so on.  All this and more had to be understood and laws had to be passed regulating these conditions.  All this would take an infinite amount of time to be done.  And all this would initially condone an infinite amount of corruption and bribery.

 

Initially the Populist Party came into existence to support the agrarian class.  Among other things the railroads were charging the farmers different rates to transport their crops.  The rule was to charge what the traffic would bare.  In most cases the trains were the only way to get the crops to market.

 

From 1892 to 1896 the Populist (People’s) Party, a U.S. agrarian political party came into existence.  It was hostile to cities, banks, railroads, and banks.  It contained the poor white cotton farmers of the South and the wheat farmers in the Plain States.  In 1896 it supported the Democratic candidate, William Jennings Bryan.  The Republican candidate William McKinley won that election.  The Populists became part of the Democratic Party after that election.

 

The major change at the beginning of the 20th Century was the Progressive Movement.  Some of its leaders were Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, William H. Taft, and Woodrow Wilson, both Republicans and Democrats.  Robert M. La Follett, Charles Evans Hughes, William Jennings Bryant, and Al Smith were also some of the reformers.  Efforts were made to reform local government, public education, industry, etc.  It was a local, state, and national movement.  It brought about financial reform with the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 and women’s suffrage in 1919 with the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.  The Presidential Election of 1920 that made the Republican, Warren G. Harding President of the United States, was the first time all the women in the country voted in a national election.

 

The Progressive Movement targeted political machines and their bosses.  They sought regulation of monopolies and corporations through antitrust laws.  They were essentially an urban movement which largely and successfully brought the country into the Twentieth Century.

The reform stopped when the United States entered World War I.  After the war with the refusal of the U.S. to sign the Versailles Treaty and join the League of Nations the country entered into a corrupt Republican period that in 1929 ended with the Great Depression.

************************************

In the early part of the 20th Century lawyers like Louis Brandeis, who later became a Supreme Court Justice, began using sociological facts as evidence.  This was a first, expanding the concept of what presented   proof.  The function of the government was still to provide a safe base for its people in which to live; they were still responsible for themselves and their families.  Basically, where the individual or family couldn’t handle the situation it was up to the local religious organization and/or neighbors to help the situation and provide aid.  This had worked up to now.

 

With the Great Depression, which was a world disaster, a good percentage of the population could no longer provide for their basic needs.  This was far beyond what local charitable organizations could handle.  In general all the neighbors were in the same deplorable situation.  Overnight the country changed, jobs disappeared and a fair percentage of the population could not handle the economic situation, but the Republic Government under President Herbert Hoover with the multi-millionaire, Andrew Mellon as his Secretary of the Treasury, could not adjust to the crisis.  There had been depressions and recessions in the past and in all cases the economy had eventually adjusted itself and come out of crisis after a period of time.  They expected that to also happen here.  Consequently they kept talking about prosperity being around the corner.  After three years the depression just got deeper and it was time to elect a new President.  The Candidates were Hoover for the Republicans and Franklin D. Roosevelt for the Democrats.

 

In addition, shortly before the election, the veterans from World War I, who had been promised a bonus in the future, organized a Bonus March and came to Washington, D.C., requesting that Congress give them their promised bonus then.  They set up a camp just outside the city.  Congress refused to vote the bonus and President Hoover ordered General Douglas MacArthur to clear the veterans out of the flats.  In the process of doing this several were killed.

 

When the election came the Democratic candidate, Franklin D. Roosevelt won by an overwhelming majority, 57.4 percent of the vote.  It was with this administration that the United States expanded the purpose of government, adding the maxim that it was responsible for the welfare of the people who could not care for themselves.

***********************************

What we’ve seen from the Colonial Period on was that the overall purpose of government was to provide a safe place for the citizen to get on with his life.  When the citizen ran into situations beyond his ability beyond his ability to deal with then the community and the religious organization would help him.  The government provided safety and security from foreign invasion and presumably a safe place to live.

The Weiner Component V.2 #27 – President Trump & the Power of the Pardon

A Presidential Pardon is a document issued by the President.  It forgives an individual for a crime he/she has committed and wipes out the penalty, usually the balance of a jail sentence.  It is different from a reversal of a jail sentence, where a person has their innocence of a crime proclaimed and has been wrongly convicted.  Accepting a pardon is actually an admission of guilt.

 

From what I understand the President and virtually every, or most governors have this power to pardon people within their state or in the case of the President within the country.  I believe that Governors use this power far less than the President.

 

Intermittently of late, President Donald J. Trump has during low moments of his thinking, brought up his power to issue pardons for himself, members of his family, and for some of his close associates and friends.

************************************

If we go back to the early 1970s, shortly after Richard M. Nixon resigned the presidency over the Watergate break-in during the 1972 Presidential Election, his former Vice President the then President Gerald Ford issued a pardon to the then former President Nixon for any crimes he did or may have committed, stating that he had suffered enough in losing the presidency.

 

Other Presidents, over the years, have issued pardons, usually at the end of the Presidential year, presumably to deserving inmates.  Presidents Clinton and Obama did this.  Never before had any President or Governor issued pardons for themselves or their families.  I suppose Donald Trump could be the first to try this.

******************************

Article 2, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution states among the powers of the President “. . . he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of Impeachment.”

 

To issue a Reprieve is to delay something.  To issue a Pardon is to forgive a crime.  Does that mean he can pardon himself unless the crime is an impeachable offence?

 

Consequently the term “Pardon” is stated in the Constitution but not really defined.  Can Trump pardon himself of non-impeachable crimes?  Can he pardon members of his family and friends and simply continue with them in office?  It’s an interesting question considering that currently Congress has a Republican dominated Congress and a Republican President.  It should be kept in mind that only the House of Representatives can bring forth a Bill of Impeachment which is then tried in the Senate.  Would a Republican dominated House impeach a Republican President?

 

If the answer is negative, President Trump, his family, and his cohorts are all above the laws of the country.  The President at will can exonerate himself or anyone else and just continue as he had been, breaking the law.  The country would pass from a Democracy to a Dictatorship and Trump could even keep himself in office for the rest of his life.

*******************************************

The question, if Trump presented it to the nation would have to be resolved by the Supreme Court.  They would have to make the final determination.

 

If we go back to the founding fathers, they certainly did not visualize anyone like Trump ever becoming President of the United States.  In fact they did not even visualize the existence of political parties.  They saw the people of the country getting together once every four years and electing electors, the wisest or most intelligent people in their Districts, and these people choosing the best man in the country as President.  And, of course, the first President was George Washington.

*****************************************

Will Trump attempt this new use of the pardoning power?  He has been in office less than one year, currently over seven months.  We have seen his presidency slowly disintegrate as he has gone along with his tweeting, public announcements, and actions, some of which were totally inept.  If anything he has denigrated the role of the presidency in the United States.  In terms of the rest of the world he has taken America out of a leadership position.  In fact, as President, he has been an embarrassment to a good percentage of the American public.

 

If it turns out that the President, or members of his family, or any of his close associates has in any way colluded with Russia in the 2016 Presidential Election or otherwise will he act to pardon himself and them.  This is being currently investigated by the Special Prosecutor, Robert Mueller.  If Mueller proves that Trump or any of the others, together or separately, participated with Russia to have Trump elected or otherwise participate in acts against the United States then Trump will probably act using the right to pardon himself and/or his family member and his other associates or, for that matter, both himself and them.

 

It should be noted the Bob Mueller is investigating both the 2016 Presidential Election and President Trump for obstruction of justice in reference to the Russian probe of the election.  He has publically stated nothing so far.  One of his approaches is to follow the money trails.  Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, stated recently on a Fox News interview that Special Council Mueller would get permission to expand his investigation if he had a valid reason to do so.

 

Recently Bob Mueller empowered two Grand Juries, one in Washington, D.C and one in Virginia.  The Grand Juries can issue subpoenas requiring the presence of specific individuals and they can issue incitements for jury trials.  Usually they are utilized when a crime has been committed.

 

Trump has hired a team of lawyers to protect him and also his oldest son, Donald Jr. and his sister, Ivanka, and her husband, Jared Kushner, who work in the White House all have hired attorneys to represent them.  The problem with Donald Trump, Sr. is that he likes to tweet and he does not necessarily listen to his lawyers.

**************************************

Up to this point Trump has alienated, besides the Democrats, a fair to large number of Republicans.  Currently the House of Representatives passed by an overwhelming majority of both Republicans and Democrats by a vote  of 419 to 3, well over the 2/3ds required to make a Presidential Veto pointless, a bill to increase the sanctions upon  Russia for interfering in the 2016 Election.  The Senate then did the same by a vote of 98 to 2.  Senator Rand Paul and Senator Bernie Sanders voted against the bill.  Since it was pointless to veto the bill President Trump reluctantly signed it very quietly.

 

With that action Congress has taken away from President Trump the ability to act on Russia.  The determination of America’s actions toward Russia and Iran have passed from the President to Congress cutting down the Presidential power.

*********************************

Currently President Trump has a problem with Mueller, the Special Counsel.  He has been upset since the investigation began.  Mueller keeps expanding his investigation and currently has or will examine Trump’s Income Tax returns that Trump considers sacrosanct.

 

Is or has there been collusion?  Trump wants Mueller fired.  Mueller has released no information about his investigation.  I believe he has hired fourteen or more extra-competent experienced attorneys to help conduct the investigation.  Trump’s attorneys have accused them of contributing to Democrats in prior elections.  Even though Trump wants Robert Mueller gone he can’t fire him by himself.  The Attorney General’s office hired him.  But the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, recused himself from the case.  Mueller was appointed by the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein after Session’s recusal.  In order to fire him now President Trump would have to fire the Deputy Attorney General and hire someone else who would be willing to fire him.  But if this were to happen then legislation is being worked upon or has passed through Congress that would allow Mueller to continue under the auspices of Congress.  Mueller would just continue what he is doing.

 

What will eventually happen?  I suspect that President Trump may be the second President to resign from his office or be impeached before he has served one full year as President of the United States.  If this happens then Mike Pence will be the next President.  I don’t suspect that the Republicans in Congress would be very unhappy over that.  I also suspect that the Republicans will lose their majority in the Senate and they may also lose or come close to losing their majority in the House of Representatives in the November 2018 Midterm Election.

The Weiner Component V.2 #26 – Responding To Your Enquiries

This article originally appeared as #114.  It was and is an attempt to respond to all the comments I get asking for a reply.

 

You must forgive me for not responding to the many enquiries I receive from you.  Generally I get a large number of responses to my blogs every day.  This includes both actual responses and assorted ads.  Of the messages a number are requesting some sort of reply.  If I answered all of them I wouldn’t have time to write a blog.  My purpose here is to respond to most of your enquiries.

 

The blog system I am using is WordPress.  Several years ago I finished an EBook that is currently available on “Amazon.com” for a small fee. Some of you have berated the fact that I do not have a contribution box on my blog.  If anyone wishes to contribute some money to me they can download my book, “Economics in the 21st Century.”  It is priced under $10.00 and it is an analysis of economic conditions and possibilities in the 21st Century.

 

Many of you have asked if I do a newsletter.  The answer is no.  I publish generally one blog a week, usually on Sunday.  If anyone wishes to get in touch with me my email address is: “bernardweiner@att.net.”  As much as possible I will attempt to answer your emails but I cannot guarantee how soon this will be as writing a blog takes quite a bit of time and energy.  Making an article look simple and natural requires quite a bit of revising.

 

Occasionally I get comments that there are numerous spelling errors in the blog.  The articles when published have none.  If they do exist then hackers have gotten into the article.  I am also continually asked about spam, how to get rid of it.  Within the last month advertisers seem to have largely dropped me.  I would suspect that eventually if you persist with your blogs most advertisers will get tired of sending you their ads.

 

I am not overly sophisticated in computer technology.  After I had completed my E-book I hired someone for a moderate fee to prepare and publish the book on Amazon.com and to set me up with a blog.  If you wish to set up your own blog or otherwise need technical aid he can be reached at: ”author19@gmail.com.”  For a reasonable fee he can set you up with your own blog or whatever.

 

Some of you have commented that the blog loads quickly and a few have stated that it does this slowly.  I would assume that in the latter case it has to do with whatever program you’re down loading onto.  I’ve also gotten a number of comments that it loads badly onto Internet Explorer, running off the page.  I would recommend that you use other programs.

 

Some of you have asked about a plug-in which you would like to use to avoid hackers.  If anyone finds one I’m sure he can sell it for a great deal of money to Sony and probably also to the U.S. Government.  If you’ve lost text or whatever on your blogs I would suggest you initially use a program like “word” and then copy it onto your blog.  That way you always have a copy of what you’ve produced.

 

I have received at least several hundred offers to either guest write blogs or offers from those who would like to guest write articles for my blog.  While, I’m sure, these are well intended it would take too much time to deal with.  Also I am not an editor but an author.  I write about with what strikes me as pertinent at any particular time.

 

Some of you have complained that when requesting an Email you get four similar responses.  I have had the same problem in other instances.  I am not technically savvy to know how to solve it.

 

I understand my blog can be found on Google, Yahoo News, Twitter, and other services.  I assume these people pick up and transmit articles they believe will be of use to their readers.

 

I can always be contacted through the “Comment Section” at the bottom of the blog.  WordPress lists all Comments and I also receive the message as an Email.

 

You should easily be able to get to my blogs by typing in: “bernardweiner.com”.  A number of Bernard Weiners will come up.  I am the one that’s listed as: author, historian, and economist.  That should bring up my latest blog.  If you then click “Home” toward the top of the page you will go to the current article followed by a number of recent blogs that can be read at the same time.

 

On the top of the first page there is a short biography in the “About Me” section and a quick synopsis of my book, “Economics in the 21st Century.”  In the “My Book” section in addition there are a number of recent blogs listed.  At this point I’ve published well over 200 articles during the last four or five years.  The last ten are listed in reverse order on this page.

 

A number of enquiries ask for permission to quote articles or sections of articles.  Nothing here is copyrighted.  The articles are written to present my interpretation of much of society.  Feel free to use any blog(s) or part(s) of any blog that you feel would be useful to you or your friends.

 

Writing is work.  It requires thought and time.  The article must be written and generally revised.  I find the process very worthwhile because it requires thinking a subject through from different aspects.  It generally gives the author a level of understanding that he did not have before he wrote the article.

 

I generally tend to be about two or three weeks ahead with my blog articles and usually publish them in the order in which they are written.

 

I have been asked about Message Boards where numerous people can respond to a particular issue.  If any of you is interested he/she can start one up.  I’m sure the person I’ve listed above can set one up for you.

 

Many people have complained that the articles are too short and would like me to write more on the topic.  If anyone wants more information on any particular topic they can easily look it up on the internet.  There is here endless information that can be picked up.

 

An occasional comment mentions videos that some of the blogs contain.  I have never included any videos in my blogs.  These would be the result of hackers who are attempting to improve or do otherwise to a blog.

 

I have been asked numerous times if I could recommend other similar blogs. I am sure there are some out there but I have not spent any time looking.  Most of my information come from synthesizing information from the local news media and from some research on the internet.  Lot of information is out there but in many cases it has to be pieced together.

The Weiner Component V.2 #25 – North Korea & the United States

The Weiner Component V.2 #25 – North Korea and the United States

 

Geographically, North Korea is a mountainous country located in East Asia on the northern half of the Korean peninsula.  Its borders face three countries: China, Russia, and South Korea.  Both China and Russia are separated by rivers, South Korea is separated at the 38th parallel where 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed.

 

Most of North Korea is a series of medium-sized mountain ranges and large hills, separated by deep narrow valleys.  There are some coastal plains.  Its population is in the area of 25.2 million and it has a problem feeding its population.  In the mid-1990s the country went through intense shortages of food and people there faced starvation.  Several times emergency food was shipped into the country, even from the United States.

 

Historically Korea was a separate kingdom with its own language and culture.  After the 1905 war between Russia and Japan, which the Japanese won, Korea was made into a protectorate of Japan.  Within a relatively short time Japan imposed her own culture upon it, attempting to force it to become an adjunct of Japan.  Korean culture and language were forbidden.  This process continued until 1945 when Japan surrendered to the United States and World War II ended.

 

Korea had been liberated by the United States in the South and the Soviet Union in the North.  For occupation purposes it was divided at the 38th Parallel.  In the North the Russians set up a Communist Government called the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, with its capital at Pyongyang.  In the South the United Nations (UN) established the Republic of Korea with its capital at Seoul

 

While North Korea or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has no law of succession the head of the Kim family has ruled since 1946.  Kim il-Sung ruled until his death on July 8, 1994.  His son, Kim Jong-il was the nation’s leader until his death on December 12, 2011 and Kim Jong-Un, Jong-iI’s; younger son became ruler then.  He was born in 1984 and is currently 33 years old.

 

Kim Jong-Un’s older half-brother was murdered within the last year.  He had been a critic of the North Korean government.  What was used was a strong chemical which kills within minutes after being applied to the skin.

*******************************

On June 25th 1950, the North Korean army invaded South Korea crossing the 38th Parallel.  The Russians had built a North Korean army while the U.S. had built a South Korean police force strong enough to control the South but not strong enough to invade the North.  The North Korean army practically pushed the American GI’s off the peninsula.  Reinforcements were immediately sent from Japan.  The War lasted until 1953 when a truce was signed stopping the fighting at the 38th   Parallel.  The reason it was signed was that President Eisenhower was threatening to use atomic weapons against the Northern Korean army.

 

By that time Communist China, under the rule of Mao Tse-tung, had sent into Korea most, if not all, of its army that had originally been loyal to Generalissimo Chang Kai-shek, as volunteers, but who had switched sides when the Communists won.  Chairman Mao Tse-tung was not unhappy to lose them.

 

A peace treaty was never signed with the United States after the 1953 Truce.  Technically North Korea is still at war with the United States and South Korea.  Consequently it has built a series of concrete bunkers in the region north of the 38th parallel and throughout North Korea.  In addition the country has engaged over the years in atomic weapon and missile development.

 

To the Democratic Republic of Korea they are still at war with the United States.  They see this country as their unyielding, corrupt enemy, who they would love to destroy.  But, so far, they have done nothing because they would be attacking a mass area containing 350 million people that is considered the strongest nation on earth.

 

Today North Korea has atomic bombs and recently shot off an intercontinental rocket which was capable of reaching the United States.  Verbally, Kim Jong-un, has threatened to blow-up the U.S. but outside of talk has taken no actions.  The country claims to have developed an H-bomb.  The probability of that is low but it is a possibility.

 

The presumed atomic bomb test on Thursday, July 12, 2017 may have caused a 5.8 magnitude earthquake in the Sea of Japan.  North Korea tests its atomic weapons in old mines or deep caves.  Exploding a bomb above ground adds to the radio-activity in the atmosphere.  Enough explosions could make the surface of the earth toxic to humans.

 

The probability is that an H-bomb may be too powerful to even sanely test underground but that North Korea recently did test one.  The United States did so on November 1, 1952.  The thermonuclear weapon is 1,000 times more powerful than an atomic bomb.  It was exploded over Eniwetok atoll in the Pacific.  The island was melted down well below the water level.  It disappeared.  The Soviet Union detonated theirs the following year in deserted parts of Siberia.  I do not believe any have been tested since, at least not above ground.

 

Briefly an atomic bomb is a nuclear device that splits innumerable atoms giving of massive amounts of energy.  It is exploded about 2,000 feet above ground.  The H-bomb is an implosive device that would be exploded well above the level for the atomic weapon.  It creates complex elements from simpler ones giving off far more heat/energy than the atomic bomb.  These are the explosions on the surface of the sun that generate the heat that fuels the galaxy and allows life to exist on this planet.

**********************************

Kim Jong Un gained control of North Korea late in 2011.  His rule has seen the economy improve.  He has not compromised or opened talks with any country unlike his father who occasionally held talks with Washington in order to gain concessions.  Kim Jong Un seems uninterested in any negotiations until he perfects a nuclear missile that is capable of striking anywhere in the United States.  He is not quite there yet.

 

He has had three of the five atomic test explosions.  On July 4th of 2017 he had a successful ICBM missile launch which told the world that North Korea could launch intercontinental missiles which could reach parts of the U.S.

 

Kim Jong Un’s propaganda has argued that nuclear deterrence is a “treasured sword” that can cope with U.S. aggression.  Seemingly he doesn’t want to resolve issues with diplomacy.  Instead he wants to protect North Korea by continually strengthening the country’s military ability.  He has continually promised to achieve Korean unification.  Presumably after achieving a maximum buildup he could win big outside concessions in return for imposing a moratorium on nuclear and missile development such as large aid packages and the suspension of United States and South Korean military drills.  North Korea sees these as a rehearsal for an invasion.  They also want a formal peace treaty officially ending the 1950 to 1953 Korean War.  This will allow for, among other things, the withdrawal of 28,500 American troops that have been stationed at the 38th Parallel since 1953.

 

It should be remembered here that the truce for the original Korean War came about because President Eisenhower threatened to use atomic weapons against North Korea.  Apparently that inspired the North Koreans to develop its own atomic weapons and to use them as a threat against the United States.

*********************************

President Donald J. Trump has continually been attempting to get other nations to get North Korea to back off its missile and nuclear testing.  According to Xi Jinping, the current head of China, when speaking to Trump during a United States visit, he explained that North Korea has historically gone its own way and it is impossible to force them to do anything.

 

This may be historically true but today China is its main trading partner with whom it does 90% of its foreign trading.  Among other things North Korea gets most of its oil from China almost for free.  If China were to significantly decrease the amount it sold/gave to North Korea that country would have trouble keeping its military going.  Airplanes and motor vehicles, both military and civilian, among other things, are dependent upon oil.

 

North Korea has and supports a large military but it is a very poor nation.  The probability is that China, although friendly with America does not want to face the possibility of a North Korea collapse which would take place if the oil imports were cut.  It would then have South Korea and its ally, the United States on its border.

 

For the last 2,000 years, whenever China was in a position to do so, China has not allowed strong nations on its borders.  The probability is that Kim Jong Un is relying on this fact.  Obviously China’s goals here are not those of the United States.

 

Kim Jong Un’s position is that he can threaten the United States or anyone else and make them very uncomfortable but he cannot really use his weapons.  Once he uses a missile and atomic bomb he leaves his country venerable.  The United States is 3,000 miles from East to West and over 1,000 miles from the North to the South end.  He can kill a lot of people but there is no way he can totally destroy the nation.  Besides that in one of his European trips President Trump inadvertently announced that there were two atomic submarines in the Sea of Japan.  They carry atomic weapons and can fire them from under water.  One H-bomb could destroy his capital, Pyongyang, and the coastal areas around it.  For Kim Jong Un to fire a missile with a nuclear warhead would be an act of national suicide.

 

The problem here could be the erratic behavior of President Donald J. Trump.  He has been reaching around for some way to force Kim Jong Un and North Korea to stop both missile and nuclear tests.  To date, he hasn’t had much success and is getting more and more frustrated.  Hopefully he will not begin a military action.

 

Can the problem with North Korea be resolved?  There are actually several possibilities for this goal to be achieved.  North Korea does about 90% of its trading with China and probably most of the other 10% with Russia.  It would like to be accepted a modern nation by the United States and other countries.  Both the United States and most of the nations belonging to the United Nations have applied economic sanctions.  These are increased every time North Korea tests a new missile or tests a new atomic bomb.

 

The American National Basketball Association (NBA) star, Dennis Rodman, has visited North Korea several times over the last few years.  Kim Jong Un has told him more than once to have the President call him, while holding his hand up to his face, with his thumb over his ear and his pinky over his mouth.  The last time this occurred Barack Obama was President.  The phone call was never made.  Is President Trump capable of making the phone call?  Would it start the process of a suspension of nuclear and missile activity?  It’s very possible.

 

Another possibility is to let China broker a deal with the U.S calling off its yearly dress rehearsal of an invasion of North Korea.  Is the U.S. capable of that or is it waiting for North Korea to act first?

 

The question is moot.  Currently each leader is waiting for the other to act first.  Currently the U.S. expects China or Russia to begin the process.  While North Korea feels that nuclear and missile development protect it.  Meanwhile Kim Jong Un and Donald J. Trump are getting more and more frustrated.

.

The Weiner Component V.2 #24 – Trump at the G20 Summit

speaking at CPAC in Washington D.C. on Februar...

speaking at CPAC in Washington D.C. on February 10, 2011. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

0n the 7th and 8th of July in this year of 2017 the G20 Hamburg Summit met in that city in Germany.  The G20 Meeting is held yearly at a different city.  In 2016 it was at Hangzhou in China.  In 2018 it will be at Buenos Aires in Argentina.

 

The leaders of 20 major nations, that are permanent members, are present. They deal with the issues of international concern to all modern countries.  Present in alphabetical order were the elected heads of Argentine, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, and the European Union.  In addition the presidents of Guinea, Netherlands, Norway, Senegal, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, and Vietnam were also present.  The heads of the following prominent organizations also were represented: World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Financial Stability Board (FSB), United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Labor Organization (WTO), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OEDC), and the World Health Organization, (WHO).

 

In addition to dealing with international trade, climate change, and energy policy they emphasized global economic growth, international trade and financial market regulation, mainly issues of global significance.

 

President Donald J. Trump, who represented the United States, marched to a different drummer from practically everyone else.  As the world’s greatest negotiator, by his own admission, he tended to flaunt how America came first and generally disagreed with many established positions and scientific beliefs held by the other countries and world organizations.  The other leaders tended to be polite to him while ignoring both him and the United States.  Many had met him earlier when he had removed the U.S., from supporting the stoppage of climate change, at a prior meeting.  He had denied that its occurrence was being brought about by the release of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.  A Republican position supported by the U.S. oil industry which contributes heavily to the Republican Party.

 

In fact Trade Agreements were formulated around him.  Japan and the European Union seem to be in the process of working out a free trade agreement between themselves.  The assorted nations tended to mostly ignore Trump.

 

When it comes to diplomacy Trump is a rank amateur.  Unlike what he has done in business he can’t bully his was through.  Trump works on the premise that everyone needs the cooperation of the United States.    It was true at the end of World War II and into the 1950s with the Marshall Plan.  It is certainly not true today with many nations far ahead of the United States with healthcare and also in other areas.

 

Both the European nations and those in Asia rebuilt after the Second World War.  Their infrastructures date back to that period.  The U.S. infrastructure dates back to the late 19th and early 20th Centuries.  The world can easily get along without the United States, if necessary.  If Trump cancels or attempts to renegotiate the varies Trade Agreements that the U.S. has signed or refuses to sign new ones then all the other nations involved can make agreement without the U.S. being involved.  If necessary the U.S. can be totally ignored.

 

With Trump’s basic attitude that America Comes First, which he usually announces, he can by his basic crude negotiating skills bring about a trade war between the United States and all its traditional allies.  Will this happen?  Apparently that depends upon Trump’s actions in antagonizing all the United States’ former friends.

 

Trump’s basic attitude has been erratic toward the U.S. allies and treaties.  He has been approving toward semi-dictators and dictators like Vladimir Putin.  He has spoken about renegotiating all American trade treaties, which he calls “terrible.”

 

So far, five months into his presidency, he has not attempted to renegotiate or even negotiate anything.  He has loudly complained about China selling or “dumping” cheap steel in the U.S. and disagreed with and essentially upset all America’s traditional allies.

 

It is interesting to note that earlier when Trump was building his Trump Towers he used cheaper Chinese steel in building some of them.  He seems to call upon everyone else to do what he now considers proper but did not do himself.

 

If he does generate a trade war by placing a 20% tariff on Chinese steel or otherwise with the rest of the world by placing heavy tariffs upon their trade goods, all the other nations of the G20 have stated that they will reciprocate immediately.  The overall effect of that upon the U.S. would be to raise the price of all trade goods 20% or more and have all other nations essentially stop purchasing American goods.  The effect would not only be a significant rise in the cost of all imports it would also generate large scale unemployment for goods and services and bring about an immediate overproduction of food products that ordinarily would be exported.  So much for the world’s greatest negotiator!

*********************************

Trump took a giant step at the G20 Hamburg Summit.  In essence he took the first major step in reducing the U.S. from being a major nation, a leader among the industrial nations, toward becoming a secondary country in the world today.  He did this by disagreeing with the other 19 permanent members upon the concept of global warming, international trade, and most other policies brought up.  In the main his attitudes are based upon what he knows and believes.  Scientific or other forms of proof have nothing to do with his conclusions.  He just knows what he knows and seems to be incapable of learning anything new.

 

Trump has successfully alienated the leaders of the other nations present at the G20 Summit so that most of their agreements bypassed the United States.  He very successfully removed the U.S. from a leadership position.

******************************

Of far more interest to Trump was a meeting with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin.  The meeting was scheduled for 30 minutes, it lasted over two hours.  Present were Trump and Putin.  In addition Trump’s Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, was present with Russian foreign minister Serget Lavrov and two translators.  Trump did not have any of his foreign policy experts at the meeting.  He winged it.

 

Among other things, early on Trump asked Putin directly if he had interfered in the American Presidential Election and Putin answered that he did not.  This to Trump apparently was absolute proof that Russia had not interfered in the election.  The fact the every American intelligence agency had come to other conclusions was immaterial.  Putin had given his word so it must be true.  A few days later when it emerged that his oldest son, Donald junior, and son-in-law and advisor, Jared Kushner, had colluded with a Russian lawyer in June before he was elected to office apparently is immaterial.

 

It was their first face to face meeting.  Trump shook Putin’s hand several times from a seated position for Russian news photographers.  No American news person was allowed into the meeting.

 

The object of this face to face get-together was for the two leaders to look beyond the 2016 Presidential Election controversy and for the two countries to find a way to move forward from there.  There was no specific agenda.  The topics were whatever President Trump wanted to talk about.  Presumably the conversation covered a range of subjects which included Ukraine, Syria, North Korea nuclear threats, terrorism, and cyber security.

 

In fact Trump wanted to cooperate with Russia in setting up a combined cyber security task force.  When he returned to Washington, D.C. Republican members of Congress and advisers talked him out of this.  Trump, who never backs off anything he says, declared that he was testing the waters and would have separate cyber security.

 

It was announced later that the two nations along with Jordan had brokered a cease-fire agreement in the southwest of Syria to take effect on Sunday.

 

No agreement was reached on the two diplomatic compounds in the United States, one in Maryland and one in New York, which President Obama had taken as part of the sanctions over Russia’s behavior in the 2016 Presidential Election.  Presumably they have been used for spying.  No agreement was reached on North Korea.

 

The meeting was extremely cordial between the two presidents.  U.S. officials were surprised by the Russian state news agency’s immediate release of photographs of the visit.  These showed Trump and Putin engaged in jovial conversation.

********************************

Obviously Trump had used one half of one of the two G20 Summit days in an attempt to upstage the meeting, draw attention to himself and attempt to debunk the fact that Russia had interfered with the U.S. Presidential Election.  To Putin and Russia the face to face meeting was important because it showed Russia as an equal with the United States, demonstrating to the world who the two dominant powers are.  The meeting was celebrated as a victory on Russian state media.

 

Ordinarily when the leaders of nations meet for major negotiations the meeting is planned well in advance with an agenda strictly worked out by subordinates of both nations.  The leaders have specific purposes in getting together.  It is a major event.

 

In this case it was on Trump’s part almost a casual event.  Actually he wanted to dispel the fact that Russia interfered in the U.S. Presidential Election.  He did not succeed.

 

In fact it would be a little over a week later that his oldest son, Donald Trump, Jr. would publically state that he had colluded with a Russian lawyer to get damaging information about Hillary Clinton in June well before the Presidential Election.  In admitting this and saying he would cooperate with the government Trump Jr. verbally changed what happened, to date, three times.  And the number of Russians present has also increased.  Will there be more revelations from him?

 

Now Donald, Sr. is busy justifying what his son did, stating that anyone would have done this and totally ignoring the fact that his son committed a federal felony, which, in anybody else’s case, would now have them in prison awaiting trial for having committed a serious crime.

*****************************************************

What we have seen at the Summit is the world’s greatest amateur, in the name of the United States, deal with other nations; being friendly to adversaries and unfriendly to former friendly nations.  Will this behavior go on for another 3 1/2 years?